…Let’s consider the plight of the modern Afrikaner. There are roughly 5 million whites in South Africa which has a population of roughly 56 million. Some are of British descent, some are Afrikaners who are an amalgamation of the ethnic groups above who speak a Dutch dialect known as Afrikaans. The whites – both British and Afrikaner – are further divided into liberal and conservative, just like in the United States. The liberals are every bit as decadent as American liberals and appear to have their heads in the sand about the ANC’s intentions as they wallow in the modern-day Sodom they’ve created for themselves . Consider, for example, Die Antwoord. Or Dooma. Due to declining economic conditions, violence, farm murders, and threats of genocide by the black ANC government and their black EFF rivals, roughly 50,000 conservative Christian Afrikaners have organized a civil defense group called the Suidlanders. Note that they are only 1% of the white population. They describe themselves as follows:
We are primarily a Bible believing Christian conservative group. We call on our members to personally prepare for an emergency situation like major civil unrest. With the help of thousands of our members we have prepared and identified extraction routes and safe areas where trained and capable members will become self-reliant and proficient to provide assistance and support to the inevitable flow of refugees during crisis. Through experience, especially in Africa, we have learned that we cannot depend on international bodies to assist during a conflict. We intend to, through God’s provision, help ourselves. We also believe in the words of a century old Prophet called Niklaas van Rensburg who clearly warned the Boer of an impending civil conflict. We invite the international community to contact us so that we may work together in preparing to resist a global persecution.
Bryce Sharper at American Partisan has written Case Studies in Lawful Resistance I in which he gives a brief synopsis of the doctrine of magistrates and its relation to lawful resistance, and also gives an example of lawful resistance from Illinois.
The state of Illinois is collapsing financially. It owes its vendors in excess of $10 billion and has no money to pay its pension obligations. Foolish state elected officials are floating every scheme under the sun to avoid the inevitable: declaring bankruptcy. People are moving out in every direction. The thing is, Illinois is a lot like California: there are a lot of decent, God-fearing people there. Illinois is really the territory of the corrupt city-sanctuary-state of Chicago. I have wondered for a long time why the rest of the state doesn’t secede or at least stop obeying Chicago. I have to wonder no longer. Second Amendment activists in the state have begun the basic process of resistance by creating sanctuary cities for gun owners.
Without gun sanctuary resolutions, these new state laws could take guns away from owners who need them: after all, people who believe in emergency preparedness and survival often purchase guns for protection. The sanctuary gun resolution is to protect homesteaders and those who believe in emergency preparedness from losing their second amendment rights.
It’s easy to understand how county officials feel the need to place the state on notice about restricting gun rights. These new Illinois laws could restrict someone who has a criminal record or history of violence, even if it was years and years ago, from owning a gun. They could have turned over a new leaf entirely and now want a gun simply for home protection or hunting, but the new laws would make that very difficult. It isn’t right to place a blanket ban on people because of some offense without looking at the circumstances surrounding the charge.
The article goes on to allude to the fact that these gun sanctuary city laws might not hold up to state law. IT DOESN’T MATTER. City leaders are perfectly justified in defying state law to allow their citizens to protect themselves. The main duty of magistrates is to protect their citizens. The state of Illinois sees its main duty as thievery and oppression…
For more about the doctrine of magistrates, you can read Theodore Beza’s De jure magistratuum
(On the Rights of Magistrates) at Constitution.org.
There is also a book by Matthew Trewhella titled The Doctrine of Lesser Magistrates. You can read a review of it here at The New American. The review covers the basics of the doctrine in more detail than Sharper’s brief summary, but in a more digestible format that Beza’s longer piece.